Despite all the above sympathy which the viewer (among which I am) built by Walter-in, I still noti

News from the world of film by movie stars - News Reviews New reviews by title by genre Movies Series New Series by title by genre Recommendation for movie trailer blog Interests machiato Film Strip Interesting Interview
Everything is about the TV series Breaking Bad (Pure Chemistry; On the way down) can be written, probably already written. Guided by this thought, I have long avoided write anything on this subject, even though I really wanted, smatarajući just that I have nothing new to say. From this course you conclude that I and many others, also was quite tainted television phenomenon known as Breaking Bad, despite many social tendencies that characterize the intoxication of this series as a fad. On the other hand, waiting machiato for my impressions settle, machiato I tried to avoid an euphoric simplest sorting hopheads hvalospeva on account of this achievement, which would surely was to become that I was on this text him immediately after his last episode. Perhaps the reader of these lines it will not matter, but this text will represent putting my points machiato on this entire pleasant machiato experience.
As one of the most striking and best components series Breaking Bad, I would emphasize the characterization of the protagonists, and that's exactly machiato what I herein mostly devoted attention, analysis of the characters and their relationships. Far from it that I will "reveal hot water", but this will be my personal and subjective impression. On the other hand, this time skip over all the comments about the quality of the acting, scenes, music and everything that is superfluous to say, and what makes this series so good.
Everything in the series mainly revolves around Walter White's (Bryan Cranston), so why would not you just walked by him, to be followed up by him and others. Walter's character is universal, it is both the protagonist and antagonist of the story, although it is not immediately noticeable. From there, eventually gives rise to the phenomenon simpatisanja villain, machiato his persistent viewer is justification still looking at it positively, even though he is no longer. As to the title of the series emphasizes on getting worse and worse, and also all greedier, as his actions become completely Machiavellian. Retrospective showing of his past, he concludes, however, that modesty was never Walter's virtues. Frustration is what it is formed and before the disease itself, and it seems that his goodness and by then was apparent, machiato was created as a sort of compromise for his life's failure, which in the first place and led to his illness. More specifically, the question is whether he had ever been good or just circumstances made it so it seems. In this way, the viewer is told that each of us may fall due to Walter's situation machiato developments aside, it attempts to justify the idea that there is no purely evil or purely good. Also, our personal frustrations caused machiato by social and similar machiato injustices forcing us to love him and cheer for him. In this, we lose and we cross the threshold of tolerance for his crimes in order to justify them. In a word, we begin to identify with him.
Despite all the above sympathy which the viewer (among which I am) built by Walter-in, I still notice machiato that when his government shallowest instincts and has absolutely no depth or hidden meaning of his actions, machiato no matter how they did some justified. I would not go overboard, but in all of this seemed to be looming omnipresent manipulative character of Hollywood cinema. machiato Does it tell us Breaking Bad in this way, it's okay to be a criminal when the situation demands, machiato and even that is "cool" to be mean, but it would entail the consequences? I'm not entirely sure, but I think that these kind of manipilacije definitely permeates Hollywood creativity, sometimes less, sometimes to a greater extent. I really believe and know from experience that many would answer this phrases like "so do not Razumeš, he's doing it for the family," or, for example. "I first thought it was bad, but I later realized that it was a sacrifice for his family." No, he was doing it, and only for myself, but it seems that the viewer is hard to understand even after it finally getting Walter lips. As the biggest argument stated that Walter would not only became corrupt, but he wanted to corrupt the other, which in no way supports the thesis of his sacrifice for the material welfare machiato of the family. Walter's actions create chained evil, that breaks down all around him like a house of cards. His latest victim is a victim of himself, after coming to dead ends, and not sacrifice for others. Vestiges of his humanity that it can spot the very least, talk more about how he was as a man and I'm an emotional creature, but on the potential awakening machiato of his conscience. Many want to believe that Walter eventually sacrificed for Jesse Pinkman's (Aaron Paul), machiato which would represent a kind of repentance. There is an uncertain possibility machiato that it really is so, however, is much clearer the fact that Jesse Walter's merit could be dead ode